Reasearch Awards nomination

Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Radiation Oncology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research

Dosimetric effect of CT contrast agent in CyberKnife treatment plans

Hee Jung Kim12, Ah Ram Chang1, Yang-Kyun Park3 and Sung-Joon Ye34*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

2 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea

3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

4 Department of Transdisciplinary Studies and Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Seoul National University, Suwon, South Korea

For all author emails, please log on.

Radiation Oncology 2013, 8:244  doi:10.1186/1748-717X-8-244

Published: 18 October 2013

Abstract

Background

To investigate the effect of computed tomography (CT) contrast enhancement (CE) on the 3D dose distributions of non-coplanar small field beams in the CyberKnife (CK) treatment planning system (TPS) for the stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

Methods

Twenty-two pre-CE CT treatment plans were recruited to this retrospective plan study. Their post-CE CT plans were based on the pre-CE CT plan data and calculated using the same MU and beam paths in either Ray-Tracing or Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms. The differences in the doses of the beam path and the reference point between the pre- and post-CE CT plans were compared. The minimum, maximum, and mean doses in dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of target and organs-at-risk (OARs) were also compared.

Results

The dose differences between the pre- and post-CE plans in a single beam path were less than 1.05% in both calculation algorithms, with respect to the prescription dose. At the center of the target volume, it was 1.9% (maximum 6.2%) in Ray-Tracing and 1.6% (maximum 4.0%) in MC. The CA effect showed on average 1.2% difference in the OAR maximum dose (maximum 7.8% in Ray-Tracing and 7.2% in MC). In the lung cases, the CT CE resulted in a dose difference of 2.4% (from 1.0% to 6.5%) without the calculation algorithm effect (maximum 20.3%).

Conclusions

The CK treatment plan using the post-CE CT generally afforded less than 2% dose differences from the pre-CE CT plan. However, it could be up to 7.8% depending on the target positions in a body and be more than 20% with the calculation algorithms. Thus, the post-CE CT in CK treatment plans should be used with careful consideration for the CA effect, target position, and calculation algorithm factors.

Keywords:
CyberKnife; CT contrast; Small field beam