Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Radiation Oncology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

3D Variation in delineation of head and neck organs at risk

Charlotte L Brouwer1*, Roel JHM Steenbakkers1, Edwin van den Heuvel2, Joop C Duppen3, Arash Navran3, Henk P Bijl1, Olga Chouvalova1, Fred R Burlage1, Harm Meertens1, Johannes A Langendijk1 and Aart A van 't Veld1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

2 Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

3 Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

For all author emails, please log on.

Radiation Oncology 2012, 7:32  doi:10.1186/1748-717X-7-32

Published: 13 March 2012

Abstract

Background

Consistent delineation of patient anatomy becomes increasingly important with the growing use of highly conformal and adaptive radiotherapy techniques. This study investigates the magnitude and 3D localization of interobserver variability of organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck area with application of delineation guidelines, to establish measures to reduce current redundant variability in delineation practice.

Methods

Interobserver variability among five experienced radiation oncologists was studied in a set of 12 head and neck patient CT scans for the spinal cord, parotid and submandibular glands, thyroid cartilage, and glottic larynx. For all OARs, three endpoints were calculated: the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Concordance Index (CI) and a 3D measure of variation (3D SD).

Results

All endpoints showed largest interobserver variability for the glottic larynx (ICC = 0.27, mean CI = 0.37 and 3D SD = 3.9 mm). Better agreement in delineations was observed for the other OARs (range, ICC = 0.32-0.83, mean CI = 0.64-0.71 and 3D SD = 0.9-2.6 mm). Cranial, caudal, and medial regions of the OARs showed largest variations. All endpoints provided support for improvement of delineation practice.

Conclusions

Variation in delineation is traced to several regional causes. Measures to reduce this variation can be: (1) guideline development, (2) joint delineation review sessions and (3) application of multimodality imaging. Improvement of delineation practice is needed to standardize patient treatments.

Keywords:
Interobserver variability; Interobserver agreement; Head and neck cancer; Organs at risk; Delineation