Open Access Highly Accessed Research

Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan

Ken Takeda1*, Yoshihiro Takai2, Kakutaro Narazaki3, Masatoshi Mitsuya4, Rei Umezawa5, Noriyuki Kadoya5, Yukio Fujita5, Toshiyuki Sugawara5, Masaki Kubozono5, Eiji Shimizu5, Keiko Abe5, Yuko Shirata5, Yohjiro Ishikawa5, Takaya Yamamoto5, Maiko Kozumi5, Suguru Dobashi1, Haruo Matsushita5, Koichi Chida1, Shigeto Ishidoya6, Yoichi Arai6, Keiichi Jingu5 and Shogo Yamada5

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

2 Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University School of medicine, Hirosaki, Japan

3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Sendai medical Center, Sendai, Japan

4 Sendai Radiation Oncology and Imaging Clinic, Sendai, Japan

5 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan

6 Department of Urology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan

For all author emails, please log on.

Radiation Oncology 2012, 7:105 doi:10.1186/1748-717X-7-105

Published: 6 July 2012

Abstract

Background

Several studies have confirmed the advantages of delivering high doses of external beam radiotherapy to achieve optimal tumor-control outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer. We evaluated the medium-term treatment outcome after high-dose, image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using intra-prostate fiducial markers for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Methods

In total, 141 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with image-guided IMRT (76 Gy in 13 patients and 80 Gy in 128 patients) between 2003 and 2008 were enrolled in this study. The patients were classified according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-defined risk groups. Thirty-six intermediate-risk patients and 105 high-risk patients were included. Androgen-deprivation therapy was performed in 124 patients (88%) for a median of 11 months (range: 2–88 months). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse was defined according to the Phoenix-definition (i.e., an absolute nadir plus 2 ng/ml dated at the call). The 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival, the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival, the 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS), the 5-year overall survival (OS) outcomes and the acute and late toxicities were analyzed. The toxicity data were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The median follow-up was 60 months.

Results

The 5-year PSA relapse-free survival rates were 100% for the intermediate-risk patients and 82.2% for the high-risk patients; the 5-year actuarial distant metastasis-free survival rates were 100% and 95% for the intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively; the 5-year CSS rates were 100% for both patient subsets; and the 5-year OS rates were 100% and 91.7% for the intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. The Gleason score (<8 vs. ≥8) was significant for the 5-year PSA relapse-free survival on multivariate analysis (p = 0.044). There was no grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity. The incidence of grade 2 acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 1.4% and 8.5%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of late grade 2–3 GI and GU toxicities were 6% and 6.3%, respectively. No grade 4 GI or GU late toxicity was observed.

Conclusions

These medium-term results demonstrate a good tolerance of high-dose image-guided IMRT. However, further follow-up is needed to confirm the long-term treatment outcomes.

Keywords:
Image-guided radiotherapy; Prostate cancer; Biochemical control; Toxicity