Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Radiation Oncology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification

Eric Berthelet13*, Pauline T Truong13, Sergei Zavgorodni1, Veronika Moravan4, Mitchell C Liu23, Jim Runkel1, Bill Bendorffe1 and Dorothy Sayers1

Author Affiliations

1 Radiation Therapy Program, Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, Canada

2 Radiation Therapy Program, Fraser Valley Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Surrey, BC, Canada

3 University of British Columbia, Victoria, BC, Canada

4 Population and Preventive Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

Radiation Oncology 2006, 1:37  doi:10.1186/1748-717X-1-37

Published: 19 September 2006

Abstract

Background

A protocol of electronic portal imaging (EPI) registration for the verification of radiation treatment fields has been implemented at our institution. A template is generated using the reference images, which is then registered with the EPI for treatment verification. This study examines interobserver consistency among trained radiation therapists in the registration and verification of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with prostate cancer.

Materials and methods

20 consecutive patients with prostate cancer undergoing EBRT were analyzed. The EPIs from the initial 10 fractions were registered independently by 6 trained radiation therapist observers. For each fraction, an anterior-posterior (AP or PA) and left lateral (Lat) EPIs were generated and registered with the reference images. Two measures of displacement for the AP EPI in the superior-inferior (SI) and right left (RL) directions and two measures of displacement for the Lat EPI in the AP and SI directions were prospectively recorded. A total of 2400 images and 4800 measures were analyzed. Means and standard deviations, as well as systematic and random errors were calculated for each observer. Differences between observers were compared using the chi-square test. Variance components analysis was used to evaluate how much variance is attributed to the observers. Time trends were estimated using repeated measures analysis.

Results

Inter-observer variation expressed as the standard deviation of the six observers' measurements within each image were 0.7, 1.0, 1.7 and 1.4 mm for APLR, APSI, LatAP and LatSI respectively. Variance components analysis showed that the variation attributed to the observers was small compared to variation due to the images. On repeated measure analysis, time trends were apparent only for the APLR and LatSI measurements. Their magnitude however was small.

Conclusion

No clinically important systematic observer effect or time trends were identified in the registration of EPI by the radiation therapist observers in this study. These findings are useful in the documentation of consistency and reliability in the quality assurance of treatment verification of EBRT for prostate cancer.